My view is perhaps a little counterintuitive; the best tech stack is no tech stack. No, it's not really feasible I don't think, but even by using the word stack, it implies that "more is better" (see pancakes, cash, pillows, books). While that may be true in some circumstances, it doesn't always ring true when you consider the second- and subsequent-order effects of technology buying decisions. What does that mean?

As Henry David Thoreau said, "It's not enough to be busy. So are the ants. The question is: What are we busy about?"

Problems with work are bigger than even AI's capabilities.

It's amazing to me that so many large company CEO's have come out recently and stated that flexible (digital, remote, hybrid, WFH, etc.) work is hurting the performance of their enterprise. The first thing that comes to mind is "Compared to what!?"

As with any revolutionary technology, I think it's safe to say that we'll overestimate its value in the short-term and underestimate its value in the long-term.